top of page

Challenging expert testimony on parental alienation in “Family” court.

Challenging expert testimony on parental alienation when the expert does not consider it a recognized in the DSM-V can be complex, but there are several strategies that can be employed to effectively challenge their testimony. Here are some strategies you can consider:

1. Focus on Methodology: Evaluate and challenge the methodology used by the expert in forming their opinion on parental alienation. Look for any flaws, biases, or inconsistencies in how they arrived at their conclusions.

2. Question the Basis of the Opinion: Examine the data and research that the expert relied upon to form their opinion on parental alienation. Determine if the data is reliable, relevant, and accepted within the field.

3. Seek Counter-Expertise: Engage another qualified expert who can provide a counter-opinion on parental alienation based on accepted practices and research within the field. This can help to demonstrate differing viewpoints and strengthen your challenge.

4. Cross-Examination: During cross-examination, carefully question the expert about the basis of their opinion, their familiarity with relevant research, and their understanding of the subject matter. Highlight any inconsistencies or lack of foundation in their testimony.

5. Present Contrary Evidence: Introduce evidence from other experts, studies, or sources that support the existence and impact of parental alienation, even if it is not included in the DSM-V. Showing that there is a body of reputable research supporting the concept can weaken the expert's position.

6. Educate the Court: Provide the court with information and resources about parental alienation from reputable sources, even if it is not formally recognized in the DSM-V. Help the court understand the concept and its implications through expert testimony, reports, and other educational materials.

7. Legal Argument: Make legal arguments based on case law, rules of evidence, and standards for expert testimony to challenge the admissibility and reliability of the expert's opinion on parental alienation.

By employing these strategies effectively and working with knowledgeable legal and subject matter experts, you can present a strong challenge to expert testimony on parental alienation that is not based on its inclusion in the DSM-V.


1 Comment

Greetings to All Members of the Group


Goldberg & Associates just presented a workshop titled:

Dissociative Disorders In Children And Adolescents Associated

With Exposure To High Conflict Child Custody Disputes, 4/28,

at the University of Toronto.



This groundbreaking scientific research now disconfirms the

theory of Parental Alienation and explains the " resist/refuse "

dynamic between children ( that are strongly attached to one

parent, and ) rejecting a parent they refuse contact with; and

why these children have a state of amnesia that now can be

explained for the first time in this workshop.


See a trailer from the workshop at the link below.



We urge you to understand how child abuse…

bottom of page