False Allegations Must Meet the Same Evidentiary Standard as Criminal Claims.
- Parental Alienation Resource

- Jul 21
- 2 min read

False allegations don’t just hurt reputations, they destroy families.
In family court, a single unproven accusation can cost a parent custody, contact, or their entire relationship with their child. Not because they’ve been found guilty of anything. But because they’ve been accused.
This is a system where hearsay can outweigh hard evidence, and where the presumption of innocence quietly disappears behind closed doors.
In criminal court, the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt.
In civil court, it’s a preponderance of the evidence.
But in family court? The standard is often whatever the judge believes sounds plausible.
And this is precisely where false allegations flourish.
When accusations of abuse, neglect, or danger don’t require real evidence, just emotion, fear, or strategic manipulation, they become weapons. Not protections.
Let’s be very clear: real abuse exists. Real victims need protection. And the legal system must intervene when someone poses a true threat to a child’s safety.
But when false allegations are used to gain an upper hand in custody battles, to isolate a child from the other parent, to win child support, or to emotionally cripple the opposition, that isn’t protection. That’s coercive control in legal clothing. It’s state-sanctioned alienation.
If You Can Lose a Child Over It, the Standard Must Be Criminal.
No one should lose access to their child unless there is concrete, corroborated evidence of harm, not vague statements, not “he made me uncomfortable,” not “the child says she doesn’t feel safe,” without vetting the context or influence.
False allegations should carry consequences.
They should be investigated. They should require the same evidentiary standard we demand in criminal court, because the outcome is just as severe.
Because in the end, what’s at stake isn’t just a parent’s rights. It’s a child’s relationship. A child’s identity. A child’s future.
We can’t build a system of justice on the ruins of due process.
We must stop pretending that “erring on the side of caution” justifies destroying innocent families. Caution without truth is cowardice. And children deserve courage from the system meant to protect them.









The Claims made against me in order to secure full custody did not meet the threshold of a "material change" yet the case was allowed to proceed. The claims made against me in a full custody suit were dirty-drawers-fire-the-babysitter level claims and they were all false. Even more pernicious was the preface to each claim where "Father Fails and Refuses" to provide good food, clean clothes, clean child etc. I was a stay-at-home dad of six years, I was the domestic one, I set the standard I apparently failed. Those claims state I was told I'd failed and refused to change my wicked ways; therefore, legal action was needed. Amazing. It got better for the Petitioner when our GAL took…