top of page

Is denying a parent and child the ability to start therapeutic communications considered custodial interference in Florida?


In Florida, if there is a court-ordered requirement for therapeutic communications between a child and a parent, and one party has been deliberately preventing or denying the start of these sessions for an extended period of time it could be considered custodial interference.


Deliberately denying the parent and child the ability to start the court-ordered therapeutic communications can be seen as a violation of the custody order, as it goes against the spirit and intent of the court's decision. This type of interference can have negative effects on the parent-child relationship and may not be in the best interest of the child.


If one party believes that the other party is engaging in custodial interference by denying access to court-ordered therapeutic communications, they may need to bring this issue to the attention of their attorney or the court. The court may take action to enforce the custody order and ensure that the therapeutic communications are initiated as per the court's directive.


It's essential to document any instances of denial or obstruction of court-ordered activities and seek legal advice to address the situation effectively within the framework of Florida family law.


How can custodial interference impact the parent-child relationship and the overall well-being of the child involved in court-ordered therapeutic communications?


Custodial interference, especially in the context of court-ordered therapeutic communications between a parent and child, can have significant negative impacts on the parent-child relationship and the well-being of the child involved. Here are some ways in which custodial interference can affect both the parent-child relationship and the child's overall well-being:


1. Damage to the Parent-Child Relationship:

- Custodial interference can strain the parent-child relationship by creating distance, mistrust, and emotional distress.

- The denied parent may feel rejected, frustrated, and powerless, leading to a breakdown in communication and bonding with the child.


2. Emotional and Psychological Impact on the Child:

- The child may experience confusion, anxiety, and emotional trauma due to being denied access to the other parent as ordered by the court.

- Custodial interference can create feelings of guilt, loyalty conflicts, and a sense of loss for the child, impacting their emotional well-being.


3. Disruption of Therapeutic Progress:

- Court-ordered therapeutic communications are intended to help improve the parent-child relationship and address underlying issues. Custodial interference disrupts this process and hinders the therapeutic progress.

- The child may miss out on the opportunity to work through emotional challenges, express their feelings, and rebuild a healthy relationship with the parent.


4. Legal and Long-Term Consequences:

- Custodial interference can result in legal consequences for the interfering party, such as fines, modification of custody arrangements, or even contempt of court charges.

- Long-term effects may include ongoing conflict, decreased trust between parents, and lasting emotional scars for the child.


Overall, custodial interference in court-ordered therapeutic communications can have profound and lasting effects on the parent-child relationship and the well-being of the child involved. It is crucial to address such interference promptly, seek legal remedies when necessary, and prioritize the best interests of the child in all custody matters.

6 views

Comments


bottom of page