top of page

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court Established a Higher Standard for Defamation


In the landmark case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court established a higher standard for defamation cases involving public figures. This case, decided in 1964, significantly strengthened First Amendment protections for free speech and press.


The standard set in the New York Times Co. v. Sullivan case is known as the "actual malice" standard. To successfully sue for defamation as a public figure, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant made false statements with "actual malice." Actual malice requires two elements:


The defendant knew that the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity. Reckless disregard means that the defendant knowingly made false statements without bothering to verify their accuracy.


The plaintiff must be a public figure or someone involved in a matter of public concern. Public figures include high-profile individuals such as celebrities, politicians, or government officials, as well as private individuals who voluntarily inject themselves into public controversies or issues.


This standard was established to protect freedom of speech and press, recognizing the importance of robust public debate and the potential chilling effect of defamation lawsuits on the media's ability to report on matters of public concern. It places a higher burden on plaintiffs, requiring them to demonstrate that defendants acted with actual malice, rather than mere negligence or mistake, when making defamatory statements about public figures.



7 views

Comments


bottom of page