top of page

Should a family court case be thrown out if the court appointed counselor was providing services and recommendations without a valid license?

In a family court case, the recommendations made by court-appointed counselors play a critical role in determining the outcome of custody and visitation arrangements. When a counselor who is not licensed in the state where they are providing counseling makes recommendations against a parent to the custodial expert, several key reasons may justify why the court case should be thrown out.

Counseling recommendations carry significant weight in family court proceedings, and it is essential that they come from qualified, licensed professionals. If the counselor lacks proper licensure in the state, their credibility and expertise are called into question, casting doubt on the validity of their recommendations.

Counseling is a regulated profession that requires practitioners to adhere to specific standards of practice and ethics. Providing counseling services without the appropriate license constitutes a violation of these standards, raising concerns about the quality and integrity of the counselor's assessments.

The absence of a valid license may indicate potential issues of bias, lack of training, or misconduct on the part of the counselor. This could compromise the fairness and impartiality of the counseling process, leading to unjust outcomes for the parents and children involved in the case.

In many jurisdictions, providing counseling services without a valid license is illegal and can have legal consequences. If the counselor's lack of licensure comes to light during the court proceedings, it could raise legal challenges to the admissibility of their recommendations and reports.

Parents involved in family court cases have the right to a fair and impartial assessment of their circumstances. Allowing recommendations from an unlicensed counselor to influence the court's decision without proper validation undermines the parents' rights to due process and a just resolution of the case.

Given these compelling reasons, there is a strong argument to support throwing out a family court case if the court-appointed counselor made recommendations against a parent to the custodial expert without possessing the necessary licensure in the state where they provided counseling. It is crucial to uphold the integrity of the counseling process and ensure that the best interests of the children and families involved are prioritized in family court proceedings.



bottom of page