Search Results

Narcissists may struggle with coparenting for several reasons, largely stemming from their personality traits and behaviors. Here are some key factors that can make coparenting with a narcissist challenging: Narcissists typically have a limited capacity for empathy and may struggle to understand or respond to their children's emotional needs. This can make it difficult for them to prioritize their children's well-being in coparenting arrangements. Narcissists often have a strong need for control and may seek to dominate the coparenting relationship to serve their own interests. They may attempt to manipulate or undermine the other parent, making it hard to establish a cooperative coparenting dynamic. Narcissists can exhibit unpredictable and erratic behavior, which can create instability and conflict in coparenting arrangements. Their tendency to prioritize their own desires and impulses over consistent parenting practices can lead to confusion and stress for all involved. In some cases, narcissists may engage in parental alienation, where they attempt to turn their children against the other parent. This harmful behavior can negatively impact the children's well-being and disrupt the coparenting relationship, making collaboration challenging. Narcissists may thrive on conflict and drama, seeking to create tension and disagreement in relationships. This propensity for conflict can manifest in coparenting situations, leading to ongoing disputes, power struggles, and challenges in reaching mutually beneficial decisions for the children. Narcissists typically have a self-centered and egocentric outlook, prioritizing their own needs and desires above others'. This can make it difficult for them to compromise, collaborate, and prioritize the best interests of their children in coparenting arrangements. Overall, the combination of these factors can make coparenting with a narcissist a complex and challenging experience, requiring strong boundaries, clear communication, and potentially professional support to navigate successfully.

Parents should not encourage their child to run to the guardian ad Litem (GAL) or the child's counselor every time the other parent does something the child doesn't like for several important reasons Encouraging a child to report the other parent's actions to the in GAL or counselor can create a sense of obligation in the child to act as a messenger or spy. This can lead to emotional manipulation and stress for the child, as they may feel torn between their parents' conflicting expectations. Instructing a child to monitor and report on the other parent's behavior can lead to parentification, where the child is placed in a role that is inappropriate for their age and developmental stage. This dynamic can harm the child's emotional well-being and interfere with their healthy development. Using the GAL or counselor as a mediator for every disagreement between the parents can escalate conflict and tension within the family. It can further strain the co-parenting relationship and undermine attempts to foster a cooperative and child-centered parenting approach. Constantly involving external stakeholders like the GAL or counselor in minor disagreements or misunderstandings can erode trust and communication between the parents. It can hinder efforts to build a foundation of trust and collaboration necessary for effective co-parenting and child-rearing. Encouraging a child to act as a messenger or informant in parental conflicts can have negative psychological effects on the child. It can create anxiety, guilt, and confusion, leading to emotional distress and compromising the child's sense of security and well-being. In situations where there are genuine concerns about a child's safety or well-being, it is crucial for parents to address these issues directly with each other or through appropriate legal channels, rather than placing the burden on the child to navigate complex adult dynamics. Open communication, respect for boundaries, and a focus on the child's best interests are essential principles for fostering a healthy co-parenting relationship and supporting the well-being of the child.

Narcissists may feel they must have sole custody of their children for several reasons, some of which may be driven by their personality traits and behaviors: Narcissists often have an intense need for control and dominance in their relationships. Seeking sole custody may be a way for them to maintain power over their children and exert control over the other parent. Narcissists thrive on attention, admiration, and validation from others. They may see having sole custody as a way to ensure that they are the primary focus of their children's lives, thus fulfilling their need for constant validation. Narcissists are often very concerned with their public image and how they are perceived by others. Having sole custody of their children may help them maintain the facade of being a perfect parent and mask any shortcomings or abusive behaviors. Narcissists are skilled manipulators who may use custody battles as a way to further manipulate and control the other parent. By seeking sole custody, they may be attempting to punish the other parent and maintain a sense of superiority over them. Narcissists typically lack empathy for others and may not consider the best interests of their children when seeking sole custody. Their focus is often on fulfilling their own needs and desires, rather than considering what is truly best for the children. When dealing with a narcissistic parent in a custody dispute, it is essential to prioritize the well-being and best interests of the children involved.

Lawyers have a professional and ethical duty to uphold the integrity of the legal profession. When one lawyer becomes aware of another lawyer's ethical violation, they may face a dilemma regarding whether or not to report the violation. Here are some ways in which a lawyer commit an ethical violation by not reporting another lawyer's ethical violation: 1. Failure to Uphold Professional Responsibility: Lawyers have a duty to maintain the integrity of the legal profession and ensure that fellow lawyers adhere to ethical standards. By not reporting another lawyer's ethical violation, a lawyer may be failing to uphold their professional responsibility to safeguard the integrity of the legal system. 2. Complicity in Misconduct: By staying silent about another lawyer's ethical violation, a lawyer risks becoming complicit in the misconduct. This failure to act can erode public trust in the legal profession and may reflect poorly on the lawyer's own commitment to ethical conduct. 3. Violating Duty of Candor: Lawyers are expected to be truthful and forthcoming in their dealings with clients, courts, and other parties. By withholding information about another lawyer's ethical violation, a lawyer may be violating their duty of candor and honesty. 4. Undermining Justice: Ethical violations by lawyers can harm the administration of justice and the fair resolution of legal disputes. By not reporting another lawyer's ethical violation, a lawyer may be contributing to an environment where misconduct goes unchecked, potentially undermining the justice system. 5. Potential Liability: In some jurisdictions, lawyers may be required by law or professional regulations to report ethical violations by other attorneys. Failure to fulfill this reporting obligation could result in disciplinary action against the lawyer, including potential liability for aiding and abetting unethical behavior. In conclusion, lawyers who fail to report another lawyer's ethical violation risk compromising their own ethical standards, damaging the reputation of the legal profession, and potentially facing professional consequences for their inaction. It is essential for lawyers to take seriously their duty to uphold ethical standards and promote integrity within the legal community.

Mandatory reporters of child abuse are individuals who are legally required to report suspected cases of child abuse or neglect to the appropriate authorities. The specific laws regarding mandatory reporting vary by jurisdiction, but common categories of mandatory reporters typically include: 1. Healthcare professionals: Doctors, nurses, psychologists, social workers, and other healthcare providers are often mandated to report suspected cases of child abuse or neglect. 2. Teachers and school staff: School personnel, including teachers, counselors, administrators, and school nurses, are usually required to report any suspicions of child abuse or neglect. 3. Childcare providers: Individuals who work in childcare settings, such as daycare providers or babysitters, are often considered mandatory reporters. 4. Law enforcement officers: Police officers and other law enforcement officials are typically mandated to report suspected cases of child abuse that come to their attention during the course of their work. 5. Social workers: Professionals working in the field of social work are commonly mandated reporters of child abuse or neglect. 6. Mental health professionals: Therapists, counselors, and other mental health professionals are often required to report suspected cases of child abuse. 7. Clergy members: In some jurisdictions, clergy members may be included as mandatory reporters of child abuse or neglect. It's important for mandatory reporters to understand their legal obligations and responsibilities when it comes to reporting suspected cases of child abuse or neglect. Failure to report as required by law can have serious consequences and may result in legal penalties. If you suspect that a child is being abused or neglected, it is crucial to report your concerns to the appropriate authorities to ensure the safety and well-being of the child.

A post from Positive Co-Parenting Characteristics I’ve seen in high conflict parent cases. Not everyone possessed ALL these characteristics but the majority of them will apply. Having one or two of these characteristics does not automatically make you high conflict. If you have other characteristics to add, feel free! • You are controlling. • You are possessive. You use the word “my” too much. • You either cheated on the other parent, abused the other parent, or you have had substance abuse issues. Maybe all 3, but at least 1. • You fight the other parent’s right to 50/50 parenting time. You believe you are more important and deserve more time. OR you never bothered to attempt any involvement with the other parent at all, or at least for a substantial period of time you interfered in involvement. • You put the other parent on child support. You DEFINITELY did not calculate your income potential or 50/50 parenting time. • You sign the children up for sports and activities with no thought as to if the other parent can afford it. You choose, you sign them up, they pay up. Period. • Your partner is referred to more affectionately to the children than the other parent and/or you have treated your partner as if they ARE the bio parent. • You dislike the other parent’s partner. You never even gave them a fair chance. In fact, you’ve disliked every partner they’ve had. You’ve probably tried to sabotage or interfere in their time together. Seeing them be affectionate towards eachother or even thinking about them being together makes you very uncomfortable. You have to look away or distract yourself. You are jealous and insecure even if you can’t admit it. You may try to get personal information about their relationship or become upset as they take steps together. If you were honest with yourself, you probably still feel possessive of the other parent as if they are still “yours”. You may either regret breaking up at times OR you don’t want them but you don’t want anyone else to have them either. • You and/or your partner have had a substantial period of time where you were not employed nor looking for gainful employment. You’ve depended on tax payers and child support to pay your bills. Without these outside sources and only depending on employment income, you would have major financial problems at best, and homelessness at worst. Regardless, you buy things that make you appear successful and independent, even though you aren’t that on your own. You have an image to keep up. It’s ALWAYS about the image. It’s not about needing help that makes someone high conflict. It’s about using that help to try to appear better than others or looking down on those who work their butts off to have less. • Speaking of image, you are unbelievably dedicated to keeping the facade of happiness, wealth, and selflessness. Behind closed doors, there is reckless fighting, disconnect, control, dependence on other’s money, unhappiness, and boasting on social media anytime you do anything “helpful” because the attention is what you actually value. You need people to believe this facade to pamper your ever so fragile ego. This is narcissism. • You have tried to control the other parent’s time and parenting choices. • You believe or behave as if your opinion is more important and valid when it comes to parenting choices and raising the children. You’ve criticized the other parent’s choices. You’ve expected them to follow your lead and do as you do many times. • You need a lawyer on standby. • You have blamed the other parents, accused the other parents, argued in front of the children, and/or told the children about your feelings, opinions, perspectives. Your behavior has interfered in the relationship between the other parent and their child. The child has cried about this at least once before they hid emotions. • You have felt angry when a boundary was placed. You’ve acted out because of it. • You have made a medical or educational decision without the other parent’s consent and/or you have withheld information. You’ve chosen the children’s health care providers without both parents choosing and agreeing to it. • Your child has required therapy, but you most likely blame the other parent for that too. • You have at least one family member (often the mother) who is also toxic and condones your behavior. • You have abused or neglected your child in some way but blame the other parent for things you are actually doing and they are not. Engaging in behavior that disrupts the relationship between the child and other parent IS abuse. • You have withheld contact info from the other parent for the child. AKA: Keeping the child’s phone number or email hidden. You’ve blocked the other parent before. • You aren’t appreciative of others, more likely you just expect others to cater to you. • You are or should be diagnosed with a personality disorder. • You were either abused as a child yourself. OR you were entitled and coddled, made to feel superior, rarely told no, and spoiled. • You never had to depend on just you- you either lived with your partners or your parents. • You have made false allegations to CPS or in court. You’ve lied in court and/or to your children. • You are argumentative and have trouble seeing someone else’s perspective or putting yourself in their shoes. • You’ve used religion and Bible verses to try to make someone feel guilty about their choices. You’ve gone as far as tell them they are going to hell. As a Christian myself, that behavior is the opposite of Christ-like. You can’t use God to threaten and manipulate. • You tell yourself what the other parent doesn’t deserve to have instead of focusing on what they do deserve. • You have trouble making and/or maintaining meaningful, close friendships. You have very few friends, if any, that you are close enough to share TMI. • You have trouble recognizing your own flaws but are quick to blame others. You don’t recognize yourself as toxic. Money problems? The other parent’s fault. Unhappiness? The other parent’s fault. A breakdown of the family? The other parent’s fault. Lawyers? The other parent’s fault. Therapy? The other parent’s fault. Behavior problems or mental illness? The other parent’s fault. No involvement from the other parent because of you? The other parent’s fault. Your cheating or abuse? The other parent’s fault. Your child rejecting the other parent after you engaged in toxic behavior? You got it, the other parent’s fault. It’s a pattern. This is not to say that the low conflict/peaceful parent has not made mistakes. I’m quite sure they have. It’s just that there’s a difference between mistakes…and patterns that define who you are and the negative impacts it has on the children. Now, what could be done about it if the high conflict parent wanted to change? First, recognizing the problem. Second, taking accountability. Third, making things fair. Fourth, making apologies. Fifth, repair repair repair until everything is healthy. Sixth, individual therapy. Will it change though? Probably not.

Understanding Parental Alienation Worldwide Wrote: It was found and noted by cafcass, that our child's mother purposely had purchased a blank writing book, and instructed our daughter to write only negative memories within it. This aparently was happening every time, our daughter returned back from our time together. It was noted by the cafcass women that this was highly irregular and that she didn't understand why mother needed to coerce our daughter into writing wholey negative thoughts about her father within this book. This was subsequently presented to the guardian as part of the evidence of Parental Alienation. This had been after the court here in the UK had previously instructed a child psychotherapist due to alienating behaviours being found after two indepth cafcass addendum report's. Our daughter was currently at the stage of entering the second phase of therapy reunification but due to the extreme alienating behaviours intensifying during the drawn out court procedure (partially due to covid restrictions) a guardian was advised by the psychologist. However, tragically this backfired, as the guardian who was instructed, not only failed to accept all the clear evidence of Parental Alienation in the 2 reports, but also biasly sided with the alienating mother and subsequently our, enmeshed, coercively controlled and split (splitting response) daughters thoughts, feelings and wishes. This meant the court had no alternative but to send it to a contested hearing. During that time, my solicitors contacting me saying that mother had said to court that our daughter would kill herself, if she was made to live with her father. At this point, and after nearly 2 and a half years in court, I decided to stop all proceedings. I was devastated, along with my mum, sisters and nephew, but we could not continue - despite knowing that it was mother's tricks - for the immediate safety of our daughters mental health. Since then, I have set up Understanding Parental Alienation Worldwide over the last 2 and a half years to raise awareness of the issues of Parental Alienation.

1. Lack of Notice: If you were not properly notified of court hearings or important legal actions related to your case, your right to due process may have been violated. Adequate notice is essential to ensure that you have an opportunity to participate and present your side of the story. 2. Limited Opportunity to Be Heard: Due process requires that both parties have a meaningful opportunity to be heard in court. If you were not given a chance to present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, or make arguments on your behalf, your due process rights may have been compromised. 3. Biased Decision-Making: If the judge in your case shows bias or prejudice against you, it can impact the fairness of the proceedings and violate your right to an impartial tribunal. A judge's impartiality is fundamental to upholding due process rights. 4. Procedural Errors: Mistakes or errors in the legal procedures followed during your case can indicate a denial of due process. This could include failing to follow proper court rules, disregarding evidence, or making decisions without a legal basis. 5. Limited Access to Legal Representation: If you were not given the opportunity to secure legal representation or were prevented from consulting with an attorney during critical stages of the case, your due process rights may have been violated. 6. Failure to Consider Relevant Evidence: If the court disregarded important evidence or information that could have impacted the outcome of the case, it may indicate a failure to uphold your right to present a defense.

"Explain to me how a psychologist who is supposed to be diagnosing or discrediting suspicions of parental alienation would be in violation of ethical standards of practice for competence if they were not educated on parental alienation". An ethical standard of practice for psychologists is to maintain competence in their field of practice. This includes staying informed about developments in psychological research, techniques, and knowledge that are relevant to their practice. Parental alienation is a complex and sensitive issue that can have significant impacts on the mental health and well-being of children and families. If a psychologist is tasked with diagnosing or discrediting suspicions of parental alienation but lacks education or training on this specific topic, they may be in violation of ethical standards of practice for competence in several ways: 1. Lack of Knowledge: Without proper education on parental alienation, the psychologist may not be able to accurately assess and recognize the signs and symptoms of parental alienation in their clients. This could lead to misdiagnosis or failure to identify the issue, potentially causing harm to the individuals involved. 2. Ineffective Treatment: A psychologist who is not educated on parental alienation may struggle to provide effective treatment or interventions for families experiencing this phenomenon. This could result in prolonged suffering for the affected individuals and families. 3. Ethical Dilemma: Failing to address parental alienation due to a lack of knowledge on the subject could raise ethical concerns about the psychologist's ability to provide competent and comprehensive care to their clients. It is essential for psychologists to be aware of and knowledgeable about all relevant issues that may impact their clients' well-being. 4. Professional Responsibility: Psychologists have a professional responsibility to continue their education and training to ensure they are competent in their field. Ignoring developments in the field of psychology, such as parental alienation, could be seen as a breach of this responsibility. In summary, psychologists have an ethical obligation to maintain competence in their field of practice, which includes staying informed about relevant topics like parental alienation. Failure to do so could result in ethical violations and potential harm to clients.

January, 20th 2024 12:27pm "An Adult Child" That is the best way I can explain how I feel as an adult who is just about to embark on a journey to finally discover herself". One week from today I will travel three hours to where one of my newly found first cousins vacations in Florida. I have never met her or anyone on my father's side. Including my father. My mother kept him from me my whole life and it wasn't until my daughter did #23andMe about 2 years ago, that I even began to believe that I would ever find out something I so desperately wanted to know. When she told me she had matched with a second cousin I was slightly interested but honestly I wasn't overly excited. I had a lot going on in my life at the time and I don't know, I just didn't jump at it like I imagined I would. Then a year later something in me said it was time and I asked my daughter to reach out to this cousin of ours. When she went to her #23andMe app she saw a message from a month or so ago from this cousin who seemed interested in learning more about us as well. And we got back in touch. So, if she is my daughter's second cousin then she must be my first cousin. My daughter also matched with another relative of this cousin so she knew that it was her father's side of the family that we were looking at not her mother's. Her father has 2 brothers so one of her uncles has to be my father. My daughter, stepdaughter and I started scouring the internet and social media platforms searching for our newly found relatives. We spent days on Facebook, Instagram and the internet comparing pictures of family members to pictures of me and my children. We looked up the men themselves, Aunts, Uncles Cousins, grandparents. It is a HUGE Upstate New York family. We read the obituary of my Grandfather and daughter's Great Grandfather and we also read the obituaries of the two men. Yes, the two men that to this day I'm not sure which of them are my father as both are deceased. I was crushed. 💔 This cousin let's call her Jane, said that we would know for sure if I would take the #ancestrydna test as more of our family had taken that than the 23andme. I had purposely not taken any of those tests because I'm not one for giving anyone my dna but my desire to know was greater than my desire to stand my ground. Besides I know where I'm going I'm not afraid of this world. So I did it. Well I didn't just do it. I let it sit on my table for a week. Then I followed the directions on the box sealed it up and got it ready to mail. Then I let it sit for another week. One of my potential fathers didn't have any kids and the other one had three kids, a family. Do I want to be the one who ruins the memories of a father of three kids with their own kids. Do I want to be the kid of the lady that grandpa cheated on grandma with? Please don't let that be the case 🙏. I'm not sure I can take that. So I let it sit... then one day I just grabbed it off the table and mailed it. I eagerly awaited the results. Then they came... I didn't have a clue what I was doing on that ancestry app! It's not easy to understand what they are trying to tell you on there. I finally fumbled through it and to my horror it said that my father was my stepfather! Even as I am writing this my heart is in my throat and so is my stomach. That feeling of complete horror is nothing like I've felt in many many years. My body, mind and spirit felt crushed. Like I had just smacked into a wall going 500 miles an hour, face first. I need a breather. I'll be continuing this on my journey. Like I was saying, the ancestry website said that my stepfather was my biological father I don't want to go into the reason that freaked me out so badly at the moment as I do not want to go dredging up all of that trauma right before I go walking into whatever I'm walking into this weekend and the days after that. I will say that the ancestry website only says my stepfather is my father because I guess my mother filled in those blanks he didn't actually take the dna test himself. Thank you God, I could not have handled that. 5 more days and I meet my cousin...

If your concerns of parental alienation are not being adequately addressed by the Guardian ad Litem (GAL), there may be circumstances where involving legal representation becomes necessary. If you have been working with the GAL for a significant amount of time, but there is little to no progress in addressing the concerns of parental alienation, it may be necessary to involve legal representation. This could indicate that your case needs stronger advocacy and expertise to move forward effectively. If you have provided substantial evidence of parental alienation, but the GAL is consistently disregarding or downplaying its significance, it may be time to consult with an attorney. Legal representation can help ensure that your evidence is properly presented and given the consideration it deserves. If the GAL's recommendations do not align with the evidence or if they fail to address the concerns of parental alienation adequately, it may be necessary to seek legal assistance. An attorney can assist in advocating for your child's best interests and propose alternative solutions or interventions. If the child's well-being is being severely impacted by parental alienation, and the GAL's efforts have not effectively addressed or mitigated the harm, you may need legal representation to take more assertive actions. An attorney can help navigate the legal system and explore options such as seeking a modification of custody or requesting a court order for therapy or counseling. Parental alienation cases can become complex, especially when there are multiple legal issues involved, such as child custody, visitation, or restraining orders. In such situations, consulting with an attorney who specializes in family law can provide guidance, ensure your rights are protected, and help navigate the legal process effectively. Remember, involving legal representation should be considered as a last resort when other avenues, such as working with the GAL, have not yielded satisfactory results. It's important to consult with an attorney who specializes in family law and has experience in dealing with parental alienation cases. They can provide personalized advice based on the specifics of your situation.

"The Charleston S.C. Family Court System is currently under intense scrutiny and facing demands for an immediate investigation following the unjust revocation of a Military Veteran's parental rights. This shocking incident has raised concerns about due process and just cause. The Veteran's Fiance, who witnessed the corruption firsthand, has taken it upon herself to bring these findings to light. Through the creation of the website ParentalAlienationResource.com and various social media platforms, she has connected with other families who have experienced similar injustices involving the same individuals in Charleston and surrounding counties. Her relentless pursuit of justice has led her to uncover a potential network of attorneys, Guardians ad Litem (GALs), and counselors suspected of engaging in malpractice, custodial interference, civil rights violations, perjury on Court documents, collusion, and other serious infractions. The story revolves around a loving father and decorated military veteran who, despite having a strong bond with his child and no history of abuse or neglect, had his parental rights unjustly stripped away within the Charleston County family court system. Further investigations into this case have unveiled more distressing stories from other families, highlighting irregularities and questionable practices within the S.C. family court system. It appears that a group of attorneys, GALs, and counselors may have colluded to manipulate court documents, misrepresent evidence, and conspire against certain individuals involved in custody disputes. Civil rights organizations and concerned citizens argue that these alleged actions not only violate the constitutional rights of parents but also undermine the principles of justice and fairness that are fundamental to our nation. They emphasize that individuals, especially those who have dedicated their lives to serving the country, should not have their rights disregarded without proper due process. Advocates are urgently calling for a thorough investigation into the family Court system in Charleston and surrounding counties to uncover the truth behind these troubling allegations. They insist on a complete review of cases handled by the suspected attorneys, GALs, and counselors to determine if there is a recurring pattern of misconduct, custodial interference, and civil rights violations. The urgency for swift action arises from the potential harm inflicted upon numerous children and innocent families who have been subiected to this alleged abuse of power. If substantiated, the implications could be far-reaching, casting doubt on previous rulings and decisions made by the implicated professionals. As this story continues to unfold, it promises to shed light on the systemic issues plaguing the family court system in Charleston and surrounding counties. The fate of numerous families hangs in the balance as those working towards restoring confidence in the fairness and impartiality of the court system delve deeper into these disturbing allegations, If you believe you or your family have been or are currently victims of the Family Court System in Charleston South Carolina or surrounding counties, we encourage you to reach out via email to News@ParentalAlienationResource.com. Stay tuned for further updates as the investigation progresses and strives to bring justice to those affected.