Search Results

The following are 40 questions designed to help assess whether a parent is experiencing parental alienation  by exploring their experiences, observations, and interactions with their child and the other parent. These questions should be used with the guidance of professionals, as parental alienation is a complex issue that requires careful analysis. These questions are for educational purposes only. General Relationship with the Child 1. How would you describe your relationship with your child? 2. Has your relationship with your child changed recently? If so, how? 3. Does your child appear comfortable around you, or do they seem hesitant? 4. Have you noticed any significant shifts in how your child interacts with you? 5. Does your child express affection toward you like they used to? 6. Do they seem upset or distant when they come to your home or spend time with you? Child’s Behavior and Communication 7. Has your child ever expressed negative feelings toward you without a clear reason? 8. Do they ever refuse to spend time with you or come to your home? 9. Has your child accused you of things you haven’t done? 10. Does your child avoid sharing details about their time with the other parent? 11. Have they ever said things about you that sound like they come from the other parent? 12. Has your child ever used language or phrases that seem unusually mature for their age? 13. Do they consistently side with the other parent, even in minor disagreements? Interference with Parenting Time 14. Has the other parent ever canceled or interfered with your scheduled visitation? 15. Have there been unexplained delays or obstacles in picking up or dropping off your child? 16. Have you been denied access to your child’s school or medical information? 17. Have you experienced sudden changes in parenting schedules without explanation? 18. Does the other parent frequently make excuses for why your child cannot see you? 19. Has the other parent ever encouraged your child to skip visits with you? Statements from the Other Parent 20. Has the other parent said negative things about you in front of your child? 21. Has the other parent ever accused you of being unsafe, neglectful, or abusive without justification? 22. Have you been told that your child doesn’t want to see you or feels afraid of you? 23. Has the other parent made accusations against you to teachers, doctors, or others in authority? 24. Does the other parent blame you for the separation or other family issues? Child’s Perceptions and Attitudes 25. Does your child express anger toward you that feels disproportionate or unexplained? 26. Have they ever repeated criticisms about you that you believe originated from the other parent? 27. Does your child ever accuse you of things they couldn’t have witnessed or known about directly? 28. Has your child ever expressed guilt or worry about spending time with you? Communication with the Child 29. Are there difficulties in contacting your child via phone, text, or other means? 30. Does your child respond to your calls or texts when they are with the other parent? 31. Have you noticed a difference in how your child communicates with you versus the other parent? 32. Do you feel your child avoids meaningful conversations with you? Behavior of the Other Parent 33. Has the other parent discouraged your child from calling or spending time with you? 34. Have you noticed the other parent controlling your child’s interactions with you? 35. Has the other parent ever withheld important information about your child (e.g., school events, medical updates)? 36. Has the other parent ever involved your child in adult conflicts or court matters? Emotional Impact on You 37. How has this situation affected your ability to maintain a bond with your child? 38. Do you feel like you’re losing your connection with your child? 39. How has the behavior of the other parent impacted your ability to co-parent effectively? 40. Do you feel your concerns are being dismissed or misunderstood by others involved? Key Observations: The answers to these questions should be reviewed by a qualified mental health or legal professional  to determine if there are signs of parental alienation or other co-parenting challenges. Parental alienation involves patterns of behavior aimed at disrupting the child’s relationship with the targeted parent, and careful analysis is essential to avoid false conclusions. Disclaimer:  This advice cannot be considered legal advice and is for educational purposes only. For legal advice, consult a qualified attorney.

Parental alienation can be a sensitive and nuanced issue. The following questions are designed to help gather information about a child’s experiences and perceptions in a manner that is non-leading, child-focused, and appropriate. These questions aim to identify potential signs of alienation while being mindful of the child’s age and feelings. These are for educational purposes and should be used with professional guidance. General Relationship with Both Parents 1. Can you tell me what you like about spending time with [Parent A]? 2. Can you tell me what you like about spending time with [Parent B]? 3. How do you feel when you’re with [Parent A]? 4. How do you feel when you’re with [Parent B]? 5. What activities do you enjoy doing with each parent? 6. Do you feel comfortable talking to both parents about your feelings? 7. Do you ever feel like one parent is upset with you for spending time with the other parent? Statements or Beliefs About Each Parent 8. What do you think [Parent A] is like as a person? 9. What do you think [Parent B] is like as a person? 10. Have you heard anything about [Parent A] that makes you uncomfortable? 11. Have you heard anything about [Parent B] that makes you uncomfortable? 12. Has anyone told you that one parent doesn’t love you or care about you? 13. Have you ever been told to keep secrets from one parent? 14. Have you ever been told something bad about one parent by the other parent? Changes in Relationships 15. How has your relationship with [Parent A] changed over time? 16. How has your relationship with [Parent B] changed over time? 17. Do you feel closer to one parent than the other? Why? 18. Are there things you used to do with one parent that you don’t do anymore? Why? 19. Has one parent ever told you not to see or talk to the other parent? Influence from Others 20. Do you hear other family members say things about [Parent A] or [Parent B]? 21. Do you ever feel like you need to choose between your parents? 22. Has anyone ever asked you to spy on or report what happens at one parent’s house? 23. Do you feel like you need to protect one parent from the other parent? 24. Do your friends say things about your parents that upset you? Time with Each Parent 25. Do you look forward to spending time with [Parent A]? Why or why not? 26. Do you look forward to spending time with [Parent B]? Why or why not? 27. Do you feel the same way about spending time with both parents? 28. Do you feel like you get enough time with each parent? 29. Has one parent ever stopped you from going to the other parent’s house? Communication Between Parents 30. Do your parents talk to each other about you? 31. Do you ever feel like you’re stuck in the middle when your parents argue? 32. Do your parents say nice things about each other? 33. Have you ever felt like one parent was angry because you spent time with the other? Feelings About the Situation 34. How do you feel about living with [Parent A]? 35. How do you feel about living with [Parent B]? 36. Do you feel loved by both of your parents? 37. Is there anything you wish you could tell your parents but feel you can’t? 38. Do you ever feel scared or worried about seeing one of your parents? 39. Have you ever been asked to choose between your parents? 40. Is there anything else you’d like to share about your family or how you feel? Important Note: The answers to these questions must be interpreted carefully by a qualified professional, such as a child psychologist, family therapist, or custody evaluator, who understands the dynamics of parental alienation and can identify if the behaviors indicate alienation or are part of a broader family conflict. This advice cannot be considered legal advice and is for educational purposes only. For legal advice, consult a qualified attorney.

Please act immediately using the suggestions below. Dear friends and colleagues of Parental Alienation Study Group and Alienated Parents Worldwide, The Wall Street Journal very recently published a scathing article written by Dan Frosch about reunification programs specifically and about parental alienation more generally. READ THE ARTICLE HERE: short link: https://bit.ly/3z390Pl ; Full link: https://www.wsj.com/us-news/reunification-therapy-custody-family-court-5b4e9279 [You might need to pay to access the article and to comment, but you can pay $7 a month and then cancel or you can probably sign up for a free month and then cancel.] By her own admission, Tina Swithin of One Mom’s Battle collaborated with the author of this article ( https://www.facebook.com/share/p/tM8pTbwi6xaaEmHd/ ): Tina Wrote; Since March, I have been assisting with important story that went live last night on the Wall Street Journal. This type of exposure is difficult to come by and I continue to say that my hope right now rests in the hands of the media. Here is what I know: media outlets track stories, including the shares and the engagement. we have an incredible opportunity right now to ensure that this article is seen all around the world and that there will be more coverage on this topic. The more traction it gets, the better the chances are that other major outlets will pick up on this - and do their own stories. This is a very important call to action: 1. Share this article from Dan Frosch of the Wall Street Journal. 2. Leave a comment - request more coverage on family court issues. Share your experience in a brief and concise format. Thank them for covering this topic: the reunification industry. 3. Forward it to your friends and family - ask them to share and comment and let them know how important this is. “The “alienation industry” which is made up of reunification profiteers will go down in history as one of the biggest scandals of our lifetime. It is the “cash for kids” of the family court system. It is a very well-structured, multilevel marketing scheme with reunification therapists and other family court professionals as the bottom feeders - going all the way up to the big ticket items which are reunification camps. I look forward to the day that I can post mugshots of these individuals who are turning children’s trauma into revenue streams. In a perfect world, children would have access to both parents, however, there are some parents who do not deserve a seat at the table. Our court system is forcing children into relationships with abusive parents - and there are a lot of unscrupulous professionals making ungodly amount of money off of this racket. I am absolutely grateful to Dan Frosch for exposing this dark industry, it is the underbelly of the family court system.” Don’t Let this woman and this article destroy any more families! Alienated Parents you know the truth! Ms. Swithin issued a CALL FOR ACTION to get this story picked up by other media outlets and to ultimately influence public policy. Let's follow her lead... and leave a comment about this highly biased story. It uses a straw man argument about reunification therapy and then condemns the therapy. Let everyone know that OMB is trying to influence public policy through science denial and anecdotal accounts that are not substantiated or the norm. In other words, these accounts are NOT based on science or facts or a sense of reality but rather misinformation and disinformation. Let’s fill their comment section with actual truths from parents such as yourself!! According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, “Misinformation is the inadvertent spread of false information without intent to harm, while disinformation is false information designed to mislead others and is deliberately spread with the intent to confuse fact and fiction.” Although the old adage 'any publicity is good publicity' has truth to it, the WSJ article displays a bias about the existence of PA and, more specifically, on reunification programs. This creates an opportunity for us to advocate using the WSJ platform to share our many voices! In your own words, please e-mail the author about your reality and experience with PA abuse to dan.frosch@wsj.com (Author). Importantly, we urge you to write to the editors of the Wall Street Journal to wsj.ltrs@wsj.com (“Letters to the Editor”) and let them know that the reporter has written a totally biased story that was influenced by OMB and not by normative science. Convey to them that the article is focused on only negative experiences and omits positive outcomes, that it uses emotionally charged language to paint a negative portrayal of cliinical protocols that are not widely understood by others, and emphasizes criticisms from sources that reinforce this perspective. It is, in short, the exception and not the rule. You might wish to include the article title and date: August 24, 2024 "A Court-Ordered Therapy That Separates Kids From a Parent They Love Stirs a Backlash" Demand that the story be retracted in its entirety or, in the very least, that the other side be told as well. As an alternative, demand the article gets rewritten due to its blatant omission and misinformation. Spread this message wide and far. As always, please visit the PASG website regularly for additional information as well as for resources available only to our members: https://www.pasg.info . If you are not currently a member, please sign up today by following the instructions on the Membership tab. Encourage other like-minded individuals who have an interest in the topic of parental alienation to become members also. Call out to affiliated organizations to join our efforts. Help us fight the misinformation! Thank you. PASG wishes to thank Yaakov, Brian and Robert for their contributions to this effort.

Early intervention plays a crucial role in preventing parental alienation from escalating and minimizing its impact on the child. Here are some key reasons early intervention is important: Early intervention can help prevent parental alienation from causing long-lasting emotional and psychological harm to the child. By addressing alienating behaviors early on, professionals can work to repair the parent-child relationship and minimize the negative impact on the child's well. Early intervention focuses on promoting healthy and positive relationships between the child and both. By addressing issues of alienation at an early stage, professionals can help the family rebuild trust, improve communication, and foster a supportive co-parenting environment. Early intervention allows professionals to identify warning signs of parental alienation and intervene before the situation worsens. By recognizing the subtle signs of alienating behaviors, professionals can implement strategies to address the root causes and prevent further escalation. Early intervention empowers parents with the knowledge and skills needed to prevent alienation and promote a healthy co-parenting relationship. By providing education, support, and resources to parents, professionals can help them navigate challenging situations and avoid behaviors that may contribute to alienation. Early intervention aims to strengthen family dynamics and promote positive interactions among family members. By addressing underlying issues and improving communication, professionals can help families overcome challenges and work together to create a supportive and nurturing environment for the child. Overall, early intervention in cases of parental alienation is essential for preventing escalation, addressing underlying issues, and promoting the well-being of the child. By taking proactive steps to address alienating behaviors and promote healthy relationships, professionals can help families navigate challenges and work towards a positive outcome for all involved.

In the landscape of family law, the role of Guardian ad LitemGAL) is crucial ensuring the best interests of the child are prioritized. This appointed advocate navigates often tumultuous waters of custody disputes often dealing with sensitive issues such as parental alienation. Parental alienation occurs when one parent to undermine the relationship between the child and the other parent, which can lead to emotional distress and long-term psychological damage for the child involved The selection of an appropriate expert to evaluate parental alienation is paramount, especially in cases where the child's well-being is at stake. Understanding Parental Alienation Parental alienation refers to a process where one parent negatively influences a child’s perception of the other parent, creating unwarranted fear, distrust, or hostility. This behavior can lead to significant emotional harm for the child and disrupt healthy familial relationships. While parental alienation is widely recognized in practice, it remains a contentious topic within psychological circles, particularly regarding its classification in reputable diagnostic manuals like the DSM-5. The DSM-5, the standard classification of mental disorders used by mental health professionals, does not specifically include parental alienation as a formal diagnosis. However, this does not negate the reality of the phenomenon or its detrimental effects on children. It highlights the need for careful expert evaluation to distinguish between legitimate concerns regarding alienation and broader issues like parental conflict or manipulation. The Responsibility of the Guardian ad Litem A GAL is tasked with investigating the circumstances surrounding a child’s living situation and making recommendations to the court based on their findings. In cases involving allegations of parental alienation, the GAL's responsibility includes selecting a qualified expert who can accurately assess the situation and provide an informed opinion on whether parental alienation is occurring. When a GAL opts for an expert who dismisses parental alienation by stating that it is not acknowledged in the DSM-5, several critical issues arise: 1. **Inadequate Assessment**: Choosing an expert who does not recognize parental alienation compromises the integrity of the assessment. Such an expert may overlook essential behaviors and dynamics that signify alienation, ultimately resulting in an incomplete or flawed examination of the child's experiences. 2. **Risk of Misdiagnosis**: If the chosen expert is biased against the concept of parental alienation, they may misinterpret the symptoms or behaviors displayed by the child. This misinterpretation can lead to inappropriate recommendations or interventions, potentially leaving the child vulnerable to continued emotional abuse or manipulation. 3. **Legal Implications**: A GAL’s failure to secure a thorough and balanced assessment can have lasting legal ramifications for custody arrangements. If the court receives incomplete or misleading information, it may make decisions that fail to protect the child from ongoing harm. 4. **Impact on the Child's Well-Being**: Most importantly, the child’s emotional and psychological well-being is put at risk. Children in situations of parental alienation often experience confusion, anxiety, and feelings of loyalty conflict. A poor evaluation may prevent necessary interventions that could help restore the child’s relationship with the alienated parent and mitigate the negative effects of alienation. The consequences of selecting an inappropriate expert in cases of parental alienation extend beyond the courtroom; they impact the lives of children caught in the crossfire of parental conflict. Guardians ad Litem must exercise due diligence in choosing professionals who not only understand the nuances of parental alienation but also recognize its implications for child welfare. By prioritizing a comprehensive and informed approach to evaluation, GALs can better serve their clients and work towards healthier outcomes for children facing the distressing realities of parental alienation. In summary, the intersection of legal representation, psychological evaluation, and child welfare necessitates a thoughtful and informed selection of experts to ensure that children receive the protection and support they need. Recognizing and addressing parental alienation—despite its contentious status within diagnostic frameworks—remains essential for fostering the emotional health and stability of affected children.

The Emotional State of the Targeted Parent in Parental Alienation Cases is Often Used Against Them in Court. As we outlined in our previous post Parental Alienation & The Stages of Grief targeted parents go through the same 5 stages of grief as a parent suffering the death of a child and this should not be used against them. Alienated parents frequently find themselves navigating the complex terrain of legal battles while grappling with the intense emotional upheaval that comes with being estranged from their children. However, there is a prevailing misconception that displaying emotions, especially grief, in court and towards individuals working within the system may be perceived as a sign of anger, weakness, or instability. This article aims to shed light on the importance of allowing alienated parents to express their emotional state without facing unjust repercussions. Parental alienation is a tragic phenomenon that occurs when one parent manipulates a child into harboring unjustified fear, anger, or hostility towards the other parent. The alienated parent often experiences intense feelings of grief, loss, and helplessness as they witness the deterioration of their relationship with their child. Often the loss is referred as, and equivalent to, “mourning the death of a child which is still alive”. In the adversarial environment of family court, where legal battles unfold, expressing these emotions can be misconstrued as a lack of emotional stability or an inability to prioritize the child's best interests. It is crucial to recognize that the stages of grief, as outlined by psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, namely denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance, are a natural response to loss. Alienated parents are not immune to these emotions; they are coping with the profound loss of a relationship with their child, a bond that is irreplaceable and fundamental to their identity as parents. Suppressing or penalizing them for expressing these emotions only adds to their anguish and undermines their ability to heal and move forward. Family court judges and those within the Family Court System play a pivotal role in shaping the outcomes of parental alienation cases. It is essential for them to approach these cases with empathy, understanding, and a nuanced perspective on the complexities of grief and emotional distress. Rather than viewing emotional expression as a sign of weakness, hostility, or instability they should be viewed as a testament to the depth of the parent-child bond and the pain caused by its rupture. Alienated parents should not be penalized for experiencing and showing their stages of grief in family court. Instead, they should be supported, validated, and provided with resources to address their emotional well-being. By fostering a compassionate and supportive environment, family court judges, attorneys, therapists and Guardians can empower alienated parents to navigate the legal process while actively engaging in their healing journey. In conclusion, parental alienation cases present unique challenges that require a sensitive and holistic approach from the family courts. Recognizing and honoring the emotional state of alienated parents, including their stages of grief, is essential in promoting healing, reconciliation, and the best interests of the child. Let us strive to create a legal system that values emotional authenticity and resilience, ensuring that alienated parents are not punished but rather supported in their quest to rebuild relationships and restore familial bonds.

Parental alienation is a devastating experience that can leave a parent feeling lost, confused, and heartbroken. As an alienated parent, it's crucial to recognize and understand the stages of grief that you may be going through. By acknowledging these stages and seeking support, you can begin to heal and navigate the complexities of parental alienation with resilience and strength. The stages of grief, famously outlined by psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, include denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. When applied to parental alienation, these stages take on a unique significance. Denial, initially, you may find it hard to accept that your relationship with your child has been compromised. You may hope that the situation will change or that the alienating behavior will stop. Anger, as the reality of parental alienation sets in, you may experience intense feelings of anger towards the other parent or individuals involved in the alienation. This anger is a natural response to the injustice and pain you are facing. Bargaining, in an attempt to regain contact with your child, you may find yourself bargaining or making concessions that compromise your own well-being. This stage can involve reaching out repeatedly, pleading for communication, or making promises in exchange for access to your child. Depression, the profound loss experienced in parental alienation can lead to feelings of deep sadness, hopelessness, and despair. It's important to seek professional support during this stage to cope with the emotional toll of the alienation process. Acceptance, ultimately, reaching a state of acceptance does not mean condoning the alienating behavior but rather coming to terms with the reality of the situation. Acceptance allows you to focus on self-care, healing, and exploring different avenues to address parental alienation. The stages of grief have been widely studied and accepted in the medical and psychological fields as a framework for understanding and processing loss. While the stages are not prescriptive and individuals may move through them in different ways and at different paces, they provide a valuable roadmap for navigating the complex emotions associated with grief and trauma.

My step daughter was taken in CPS custody due to bio mother neglecting her by leaving her in a care of someone she barely knew. My husband at the time was considered a non respondent(meaning it wasn’t his fault that she was taken) but because his mother told the social worker that he has a intellectual disability he was not able to raise the child. My husband has mild retardation but does not stop him from completing daily task. He has a full time job and a volunteer firefighter who serves his community. Grandmother of the child wanted her grandchild for herself and gave my husband the impression that once my husband got his own place his daughter will be released to him. Him and I got our own place and because I became very attached to my daughter the grandmother started telling my husband that he can only see his daughter at her house. This is when we started filing for custody. Because the court felt like the grandparents were better caretakers they convinced my husband to sign for kinship guardianship. We filed and he was granted temporary visitation with the recommendation of taking parenting and drug and alcohol evaluation which he did both and no concerns were found. Went back months later and he was granted permanent visitation even though we asked for custody. As the years went the grandmother caused nothing but drama from calling my job and trying to get me fired, message friends on social media starting drama, physically attacking my husband, making threats of violence, threats of her going to terminate his rights. We finally got fed up and went back to court years later to file for custody and we were suppose to go to trial and they wanted to settle with joint custody between my daughters father and the grandparents with them have physical custody. Now the bio mom moved to Florida for most of my daughter life and per court agreement she is allowed to speak virtually to my daughter. When she did fly to visit grandmother would only allow a hour visit. As of recent the bio mom has moved to NY to establish a relationship with her daughter it still hasn’t been easy. The grandmother refuses to let my daughter speak to bio mom in her house and has threaten my daughter to hit her if she found out she did. Grandmother made my husband block and delete her contact info on her iPad. In my household we allow her to have that connection and bond even though many years was missed. We absolutely do not speak negative about grandparents to my daughter who is now 8 years old. I been in her life for 7.5 years and my daughter is smart enough to know who’s toxic in her life. I’ve had 2 CPS calls placed on me both unfounded. The grandparents can barely afford any of their bills but still want to keep my daughter till an adult. Grandma is keeping this child for her own emotional and financial needs. My daughter tells me constantly she is fed up living there and how grandma doesn’t love her and always mean to her. Even then I still tell her grandma does love you and loves you different unfortunately and still should be respected. As my daughter was growing up it became a HUGE issue if she called me mommy to the point where grandmother lied and told her lawyer that I force my daughter to call me mommy. I would get calls from my husbands family telling me to keep the peace and tell my daughter not to call me mommy meanwhile her bio mother wasn’t actively in the picture and I refused and told them my daughter is going to call me what she’s comfortable calling me. All these years of abuse and PTSD and the courts do not care the damage the grandparents have caused us and the child. My husband sometimes doesn’t even want to go back because he feels what’s the point they don’t see him capable to raising his child because they feel like taking her away will do more damage then good. Sometimes we both just feel hopeless and that we are letting her down when she deserves to be happy loved and at peace

When a 15 year old child has a parent, and everyone on that parent’s side removed from their lives after 15 years. Having enjoyed 15 years of birthdays, Christmases, vacations, friends, family, experiences and so on, and that child has not been allowed to see or speak with that parent or communicate with most of their other parent’s family members and friends, for a year… That child knows what they are missing and they MISS it! If you are that child’s Guardian ad Litem, it is your DUTY to DILIGENTLY work on ways to reunite that child and that parent. There should be no obstical greater than the your desire to do what is best for your client. An innocent, trusting, confused and hurting, child. And I’m not the only one who thinks this way. In the complex landscape of family law, the role of a Guardian ad Litem (G) stands out as a beacon of hope for children caught the midst of familial discord. When a 15-year-old child finds themselves estranged from a parent and cut off from their entire extended family, the weight of that loss reverberates through every milestone missed and memory left unshared. In such circumstances, the GAL's duty becomes a sacred obligation to diligently pursue avenues for reunification between parent and child. Imagine a child who, after 15 years of shared birthdays, holidays, vacations, and cherished experiences, suddenly faces a void created by the absence of a parent and the severance of all ties to that parent's side of the family. This isolation goes beyond physical distance; it strikes at the heart of the child's identity and sense of belonging. For a year, the child has been denied the simple joys of familial love and connection, a deprivation keenly felt in the quiet moments of solitude and the echoes of laughter that once filled their home. As the Guardian ad Litem entrusted with safeguarding the best interests of the child, the responsibility is not merely a matter of formality—it is a profound calling to advocate zealously for the child's emotional well-being and relational needs. To ignore the ache of separation and the yearning for reunion would be a disservice to the child's fundamental right to family unity and emotional sustenance. How is the guardian Ad litem further damaging the relationship between the child and the removed parent by not advocating for swift reunification By failing to advocate for swift reunification between the child and the removed parent, the Guardian Litem (GAL risks further damaging the already strained relationship them. The longer the child is kept separate from the removed, the greater the emotional strain on both the child and the parent. The child may develop feelings of abandonment or resentment towards the parent for not taking action to reunify. Similarly, the parent may feel helpless and anguished at being kept apart from their child. If the GAL does not prioritize swift reunification, both the child and the parent may lose trust in the system and in the GAL's ability to act in their best interests. This lack of trust can lead to further deterioration of the relationship between the child and the parent. Delaying reunification can result in missed opportunities for reconciliation and healing. The longer the separation persists, the harder it may become for the child and the parent to bridge the emotional gap that has formed between them. In some cases, prolonged separation enforced by legal proceedings can escalate conflicts and lead to legal battles that further strain the relationship. A GAL who does not advocate for swift reunification may inadvertently contribute to escalating legal conflicts rather than fostering a resolution. Research shows that children thrive best when they have strong relationships with both parents. Prolonged separation from one parent can have negative effects on the child's emotional well-being, sense of stability, and overall development. By not advocating for swift reunification between the child and the removed parent, the Guardian ad Litem risks exacerbating the damage to the relationship between them. It is crucial for the GAL to prioritize the child's best interests, which often includes facilitating timely reunification to promote healing, reconciliation, and positive familial relationships. How can the Guardian ad Litem work with both the child and the removed parent to rebuild trust and mend the strained relationship caused by prolonged separation? Rebuilding trust and mending the strained relationship between the child and the parent is a delicate and crucial task for the Guardian ad Litem (GAL). Here some ways the GAL can work with both parties to facilitate this process: Encourage open and honest communication between the child and the parent. The GAL can act as a mediator to facilitate conversations, express feelings, and address concerns in a safe and supportive environment. Listen actively to both the child and the removed parent's perspectives, concerns, and needs. Show empathy and understanding towards their experiences and emotions, demonstrating that their voices are being heard and valued. Offer emotional support and reassurance to both the child and the removed parent throughout the reunification process. Acknowledge their feelings, validate their experiences, and provide guidance on coping strategies to navigate the challenges they may face. Encourage the child and the removed parent to engage in activities together to rebuild their bond. This could involve spending quality time together, participating in shared interests, or seeking professional counseling to address underlying issues. Acknowledge and reinforce positive interactions between the child and the removed parent. Celebrate small victories, moments of connection, and progress made towards rebuilding trust and strengthening their relationship. Help manage expectations by setting realistic goals for the reunification process. Recognize that rebuilding trust takes time and effort from both parties and that setbacks may occur along the way. Encourage patience and perseverance in working towards a stronger relationship. Work collaboratively with therapists, counselors, or other professionals involved in the case to ensure that the reunification process is approached holistically and with the best interests of the child in mind. Seek input from experts on effective strategies for repairing the parent-child relationship. Continuously monitor the progress of the reunification process and be prepared to address any challenges or obstacles that may arise. Stay engaged with both the child and the removed parent to provide ongoing support and guidance as needed. By actively working with both the child and the removed parent to rebuild trust and mend the strained relationship caused by prolonged separation, the Guardian ad Litem can play a critical role in promoting healing, reconciliation, and a positive future for their family. What should a parent do when their guardian Ad litem is not looking out for the best interests of their child If a parent believes that their Guardian ad Litem (GAL) is not out for the best of their child, it essential to address this concern promptly and take appropriate steps to ensure the child's-being. Here are some actions a parent can consider in such a situation: Schedule a meeting with the GAL to express your concerns and discuss any issues you have regarding their handling of the case. Be prepared to provide specific examples or reasons why you believe the GAL's actions may not be in the best interests of the child. Ask the GAL to explain their rationale for the decisions they have made or the actions they have taken concerning the child's welfare. Understanding their perspective may help clarify any misunderstandings or disagreements. Keep a record of any interactions, communications, or observations that raise doubts about the GAL's commitment to the child's best interests. Documenting specific incidents or behaviors can provide evidence to support your concerns if further action is necessary. If you feel that the GAL is not fulfilling their duties appropriately, you may request a review of their performance by the court or the agency overseeing the GAL program. Provide details of your concerns and request a reevaluation of the situation. If you believe that the GAL's actions pose a serious risk to the child's well-being, consider consulting with a family law attorney who can advise you on your legal options. An attorney can help you navigate the process and advocate for your child's best interests. In extreme cases where you believe the GAL is not acting in the child's best interests despite your efforts to address the issue, you may request a new GAL to be appointed to the case. Present your reasons for this request to the appropriate authorities overseeing the GAL program. Engage with other professionals involved in the case, such as social workers, therapists, or child advocates, to seek their input and support in addressing the concerns about the GAL's conduct. Their perspectives and expertise can provide additional insight into the situation. It's crucial to prioritize the child's well-being and act in their best interests when addressing concerns about a Guardian ad Litem's actions. Open communication, documentation, seeking appropriate guidance, and advocating for the child's needs are key strategies to address such situations effectively. How can parents ensure that their concerns about a Guardian Litem's actions are taken seriously and addressed promptly? Keep detailed records of any interactions, communications, or observations that raise doubts about the GAL's actions. Document specific incidents, behaviors, or decisions that you believe are not in the best interests of the child. Express your concerns to the appropriate authorities, such as the court overseeing the case or the agency responsible for appointing GALs. Provide specific examples and reasons why you believe the GAL's actions may not be in the child's best interests. Request a meeting with the GAL to discuss your concerns in person. Be prepared to articulate your points clearly and listen to the GAL's perspective as well. A face-to-face discussion can often help clarify misunderstandings and find common ground. Consider consulting with a family law attorney who is experienced in dealing with GAL-related issues. An attorney can provide guidance on how to address your concerns effectively and advocate for your child's best interests. Follow the formal procedures set by the court or the agency for addressing complaints or grievances related to GALs. This may involve filing a formal complaint, requesting a review of the GAL's performance, or seeking a replacement if necessary. If you have concerns about the GAL's actions impacting the child's well-being, involve other professionals working with the family, such as therapists, counselors, or social workers. They may be able to provide additional insights or support your case. Keep following up on your concerns and requests for action. Persistence is key to ensuring that your concerns are not dismissed and that appropriate steps are taken to address them. By taking these proactive steps and advocating for your child's best interests, parents can increase the likelihood that their concerns about a GAL's actions will be taken seriously and addressed promptly. Do you have a Guaridan ad Litem that acts more like your ex’s attorney than your child’s? Does your GAL ignore your emails, only make you abide by court orders, do they violate court orders themselves? Does your GAL honor every demand of your ex while ignoring all of your requests? Do they undermine you as a parent while emboldening your ex? Does your ex treat your GAL like a friend and act more empowered than when you brought them to court in the first place? We want to hear about it. (Especially if it’s in Charleston South Carolina, or the surrounding area). Email News@ParentalAlienationResource.com Beware not all Guardian ad Litems are the Guardians some of them are the Gatekeepers.

I am a 52 yr old mother of 5. Two daughters and a son which are all adult. I also have a set of 16yr old twin sons. 13 yrs ago I found myself in trouble with the law over my poor choices. This was my first time ever being in trouble. At that time I lost my boys to the system. They were only had a cps case for a couple of months.  I served my time in jail and completed all of my requirements to get off probation. I have since reduced my felony child endangerment charge to a misdemeanor. After I got out of jail I went to a treatment facility for 6 months. I did have visitation with the boys at the treatment center.  After treatment I moved into transitional housing in my city. My visitation order was every other weekend from Friday to Sunday.  I had to meet half way which was atleast an hour drive. I had no vehicle and started a relationship that would turn out to be abusive. I had my visits for several months and the abuse started. He was abusing me in front of the boys. I left that housing and went to a women's shelter in my town. Continuing visits and the abusive relationship.  I decided I needed to get my life in order to provide healthy and safe visits. I wrote their dad a letter and put a hold on my visits until I could get things in order. I called them but they were 3 at the time, new house, new toys, a new dog...they didn't want to talk to ME. So I focused on myself. I secured a restraining order on my abuser. Secured housing, moving in as a roommate with a friend. It took me about 1-2 yrs but I did it. I began making my calls to start visits and was hit with no answer. No text. Nothing. Depression hit hard. The years painfully passed. Each birthday I would post on Facebook a little message to them. Hoping they would see it. Mother's Days were especially difficult. I have fantastic relationships with my other kids. They have never all 5 been in the same room at the same time. It's my dream ✨️. On their birthday in 2023 I decided to search yet again. I FOUND ONE OF THE BOYS!!! I did not contact him out of respect for dad and step mom. I did my due diligence at contacting their dad. Nothing...still. no reply. Family members..no reply. I was trying to keep it out of court. I set a date that I was hoping to hear from him by....nothing. off to the courthouse I went. I filed a modification of visitation. I went to court on the matter and was referred to mediation. On my way out of the courtroom I was served a petition...dad is trying to terminate my rights. Claiming abandonment and neglect. He also had MY case moved to his county. We went to mediation. Mediator recommended therapy. I was also able to be invited in to therapy. Why? Because the boys were led to believe that step mom was bio mom. Their dad never told them I existed. I was completely erased from their little lives. I did end up sending a message to one of the boys giving him my name, phone number and the fact I was their bio mom if they wanted to talk. Dad promptly allowed them to read my arrest and custody documents. Now they want nothing to do with me. I am not trying to take them away from their lives. I just want to have them in my life. If this doesn't happen before 18 who knows how long their hatred for me will pass through their minds. They were lied to. I'd say that the TRUTH is what's in the best interest of the boys. There have been THREE trial dates set. Each one changed, not by my choice. Everything about this screams PA. I have done so much research on PA I feel like I can represent myself better than anyone out there. Dad has lied thru court documents. Saying I never contacted him but the very next sentence says I did and in what years I did so. I am up against his attorney which happens to be a district attorney for a separate county. I feel I don't have a chance in hell. Prepared for whatever comes in October, definitely open to any outcome. I just want them in my life. I actually went to watch an athletic match and disguised myself. One walked right by me. 12 yrs it had been...it was the most beautiful sight ever! He is so grown up. I missed out on so much....because their dad erased me. There is alot of fine details in this story I didn't mention. Trust me there are thoughts floating in my head all day and all night. In fact, talking about the abusive relationship and reading about it In my journal from those years caused nightmares and a good amount of depression. Thank you for the opportunity to tell my story. I live, breathe, sleep this case. I have been to EVERY court hearing even just date settings. The drive is 2 hrs one way to go to court. They didn't know they had siblings! I remain positive...no matter what. The Hebrew definition of Abracadabra is "I create as I speak". I am manifesting I will sit in that counseling room with them..one at a time. Answering the questions they have both admitted to having. I did not want my first interaction with them to be tainted with the smell of cigarettes.  So I quit. It's been a couple of months now. I am clean and sober. I have a wonderful significant other for 10 years. I live in the country. I love my life and I want to share the last part of this beautiful life with all of my children. I don't want something to happen and them not know who I am now as a human being. I am not my past. My past should not dictate my parental rights either The end (or is it?)   :) -An Alienated Mother

I have 6 children 5 of whom after being abducted by their mother by being lied to and mislead, returned to me last year July. Since then my youngest who still sadly resides with his mother despite their being clear concerns around her mental health and ability to care for him has been alienated against me and his siblings for just under a year now. My son went from sharing a room on a detached house with his brothers to sharing a bedroom with my ex wife. The home is occupied by her father who has a history or violence and radical Islamic beliefs. He is now being brought up to be a radical Muslim who hates any other faith while I am powerless to do anything about it. Despite me making contact with social services, police and other agencies my cries and pleas have fallen on death ears. My child is surrounded by sexual predators, abusers and radicals while both myself and his siblings fear for his wellbeing. His school, GP were changed without my consent and the courts have taken no notice of this. Instead they chose to focus on the false accusations she spewed towards me when I made the court application to gain access to our son who she refused to allow me any contact with while ignoring our 5 other children!!! Despite being married for 20 years and no record of any foul play on my part, her legal aid solicitor and barrister have continued to lie and mislead the court into painting me out as an unfit father. The court recommended a S7 report which was recently completed and the Cafcass officer who visited us had clearly been swayed by the false allegations made by my ex wife and it was evident that she was not concerned about our children's best interest, rather she has taken the side of my ex wife without any justification or evidence to prove any of the allegations made against me. What hurts most is, the same person who has been trying to force my children to dislike me for the past few years, is no with the help of legal aid and the court system accusing me of Parental Alienation. The sheer audacity is rather disturbing! I have lost hope in the justice system which I have paid my taxes into for over 25 years and feel like it is an unjust and unfair system that supports misandry and promotes the alienating of fathers. Cafcass, Legal Aid, Women’s Aid and the Family Courts need to be thoroughly investigated as many fathers in my position are driven to the point of suicide as a result of the practices of system that is designed to protect them. Alienate Parent

From 2016-2019 I was a stay at home mom. Father and I shared 50/50 custody week on week off Friday to Friday from October 2019 to March of 2021. The weeks I didn’t have my children I drank. That was able to be used against me. At which point I was ordered supervised visitation and never missed a visit April of 2021. I voluntarily attended crossroads a residential treatment facility for alcohol from July 2021 until October 2021. Having unsupervised visits. After treatment I was given unsupervised over night visits November of 2021. We were set to go to mediation February 2022 however father was in treatment and couldn’t attend. He sent an email with a proposed agreement of every other weekend until school was out then we’d do 50/50 custody come summer of 2022. Fathers treatment took a turn for the worse and our children came to live with me full time. From may of 2022 until July 2023 there has been reoccurring issues with paternal grandmother despite my constant effort to keep their fathers side of the family included in their lives. From July 2021 to July 2023 I’ve had TWO isolated relapses. March 2023 and July 2023. After my relapse in July of 2023 I immediately reached out and got into intensive outpatient therapy! I did not have one positive test for alcohol while attending Healthy Moms and have remained alcohol free for almost a year now. I gained many tools from the groups and I’m thankful I was attending the Healthy Moms Program when Paternal grandmother got ex parte orders for temporary guardianship of my children with no notice to me. After obtaining her temporary orders my children were picked up from summer school by a male claiming to be their step dad. And to this date neither myself or my mother (maternal grandmother) have been served anything regarding petition for guardianship. When there was no visitation ordered after my attorney requested in court guardian told me video calling was sufficient and as of the court hearing on November 16th I had a total of 10 hours of visitation with my children! 5/30/2024 we went to court where I requested for every other weekend overnight. My children had a counselor that I had them established with that guardian continued to have them see until the counselor didn’t testify the way guardian wanted. I had no knowledge my children were seeing a new counselor however guardian brought a new letter from a counselor she obtained for the children in May of 2024 where paternal grandmother attended two visits WITH my children and the counselor recommended I not be around my children as they show fear when my name is mentioned!!! In a CWS case when children are taken parents get a MINIMUM of four hours a WEEK. I had 14 HOURS in FOUR MONTHS to start! And now I’m down to getting 10 hours. A MONTH WITH HER SUPERVISING! (Against my attorneys objection) I find out from my children they’ve had numerous medical appointments without guardian notifying me. My daughter was enrolled in gymnastics and it was said I can’t be there because I would start a fight with her aunt and her dads ex girlfriend which would make them uncomfortable if I were to attend my daughter’s gymnastics. However said aunt came to my sons last soccer game with no issue between her and I. So there’s question am I my children’s mother not allowed to attend their events because of their fathers ex girlfriend attending? The same said exgirlfriend that guardian used as a “neutral party” for our first visit. And the same ex girlfriend that guardian took back when my daughter went under for general anesthesia and wouldn’t allow me back. We had our final trial date January 31st 2024 also my oldest son’s 8th birthday. Of which guardian did not allow me to spend any in person time with my son nor did the judge order visitation as requested on his birthday so for the first time in 8 years we didn’t spend in person time together however he FaceTimed me from the time he got home til he had to go to bed. Now paternal grandmother was allowed to go to court with more lies and no proof and my visitation has been reduced to 5 hours every other weekend with paternal grandmother as my now court ordered supervisor. My testimony at one point was said to not be credible because guardian forged my signature and then tried saying I did it because she found a signature that was done on my phone and tried abbreviating it the same way. My response was Your honor while I did not recall signing my name like that because it was one time I’m ok with that being used as grounds to not acknowledge my testimony it was a minor mistake of simply forgetting. Her “agreement” with “my signature” doesn’t mean I did it just because she found an abbreviated signature of mine done over the phone. My testimony was coborated by many other eye witnesses. With that said if my testimony isn’t acknowledged then I’d request paternal grandmothers testimony be disregarded as well being she testified under penalty and perjury that I was suicidal many times and even grabbed a gun! Testified by many including officers that I was not suicidal ever and there was never a gun is a major lie on this matter and i request paternal grandmothers testimony be thrown out and my children be returned immediately. She has not held up to the court order of informing me of what’s happening with my children. My daughter had kindergarten graduation that I was told wouldn’t happen. My son had awards for baseball that I wasn’t told about. She’s gotten them a new counselor that recommended my children fear me and she never made me aware of the fact she was switching their counselor. In the court room my attorneys I’ve had don’t get acknowledged. I don’t get acknowledged. I was never given the option to reunify. I was never proven unfit. The courts have put information in their court findings that are false and there’s evidence contradicting the findings.